[kictanet] [ke-internetusers] Re: CCK boss sent on leave as row rages

[McTim]

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Grace Mutung'u (Bomu)
<nmutungu at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I agree there should be independence. At the moment, one always wonders how
> the board was constituted? how they came to their decision? how they
> decision can be defended? who protects public interest in the Board? if
> consumers (or anyone for that matter) is unhappy with the board decision,
> who can they turn to? Is that why there was Ministerial intervention?.....It
> would help if there was clarity on these matters.


Indeed, not sure we will get that though!

I find it ironic that when I read the Nation, there is an
advertising supplement in it, touting CCKs new Charter, ISO
certification and all the fabulous things it did in 2010, then I sit
down at my PC and find that the DG of the CCK has either:

A: gone on leave
B: gone for good
C: will be keeping his job

depending on whom one chooses to believe.  I suggest we let the dust
settle so we can see clearly before we make any judgements.

One thing is clear however, independence and greater transparency
(i.e. publicly available transcripts of Board meetings) would be a
start.


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel