[kictanet] [ke-internetusers] Re: {Disarmed} Re: CCK vsSafaricom?- and now Safcom vs the Rest?

[Harry Delano]

Mctim,

We seem to find ourselves in this "unenviable" position - Where Govt, is
Arbiter, plaintiff
and defendant - all rolled in one. So there arises need to do the delicate
balancing act on 
it's part to ensure all parties go home happy.. 

It's a daunting task, to be frank.. !

Harry

-----Original Message-----
From: McTim [mailto:dogwallah at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 9:37 AM
To: harry at comtelsys.co.ke
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
Subject: Re: [kictanet] [ke-internetusers] Re: {Disarmed} Re: CCK
vsSafaricom?- and now Safcom vs the Rest?

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Harry Delano <harry at comtelsys.co.ke> wrote:
>
> So that we do not start taking divergent positions, I suggest the need 
> for Govt to sit down with all these players, and as a 'Referee'

How is it that a shareholder in the two largest players get to also be the
'referee'?

--
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel