[kictanet] ICANN meeting and security concerns

[alice]

Hi Harry Delano  and all

To begin with I would like to encourage all those who wish  to attend 
and participate at the ICANN meeting to go to 
(http://www.registration123.com/ICANN/Nairobi/) and register please. 
Most ICANN meetings/sessions are open to the public unless otherwise 
stated on the programme. Other ICANN constituencies intend to manifest 
their support for the Nairobi meeting by registering so it is important 
that we also do as well.
For the other questions you have raised, the local organising committee 
will soon hold a public/media session to discuss/share.

thank you

best
alice



>
> Now, I have just been checking the site, we do not have a representation on
> the Board of Directors of ICANN - to lay our case.I wonder in the video Conference meeting, who will
> give the factual position 
> on the ground as most of the directors are a million miles away.
>   
> Are our local delegation participating in the meet..? If not, can we push
> for inclusion in order to 
> give a proper sitrep to them as their meeting is solely to discuss the
> Nairobi conference and security
> concerns.
>
> ICANN is supposed to land here in 2 months, - I think it's time this forum
> demands those involved in
> planning to get on board and give us updates on the plannning progress.
>
> Things are so quiet down this end, guys....
>
> Regards,
> Harry
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: waudo siganga [mailto:emailsignet at mailcan.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 5:00 PM
> To: Harry Delano
> Cc: 'KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions'
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] ICANN meeting and security concerns
>
>
> >From ICANN website
> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-20jan10-en.htm
>
> Special Meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors
>
> 20 January 2010
>
> A special meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors will be held via
> teleconference on 22 January 2010 at 19:00 UTC.
>
> The purpose of the board meeting is to assess plans for the upcoming meeting
> in Nairobi, and to consider the security concerns raised by community
> members in light of recent events. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:39 +0300, "Harry Delano" <harry at comtelsys.co.ke>
> wrote:
>   
>> Dear Stakeholders,
>>
>> I think it would be good to have a co-ordinated approach in dealing 
>> with this (probable sad) turn of events.
>>
>> Can we ask the Delegation (Delegates) who took up lobbying on our 
>> behalf to ICANN, who I assume are part of the planning committee for 
>> this upcoming Meeting - get back to ICANN and convey to them our 
>> concerns unequivocally.
>>
>> ...That, we have every reason to be alarmed by the mixed signals we 
>> are receiving from their end, and for the avoidance of doubt, we 
>> honestly now need an "official"
>> position,
>> as matters stand. Is
>> the meeting going to happen or not..? Can they send an advance 
>> assessment person(s), so that we can meet these (person/s) when they 
>> come here, so that we can address or allay their fears..? And also 
>> take them around..?
>>
>> We need to deal with this now, in a co-ordinated manner. By the way, 
>> who are on the planning committee..?
>>
>> Harry
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: kictanet-bounces+harry=comtelsys.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>> [mailto:kictanet-bounces+harry=comtelsys.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke] 
>> On Behalf Of McTim
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 7:38 PM
>> To: harry at comtelsys.co.ke
>> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] ICANN meeting and security concerns
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:13 PM, waudo siganga 
>> <emailsignet at mailcan.com>
>> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>     
>>> While awaiting updates on the fate of the Nairobi meeting we should 
>>> also think strategically.
>>>       
>> I've sent a mail to the half dozen Board Members I know personally (or 
>> from
>> lists) and offered the perspective that NBO is no more or less secure 
>> now than when the decision to hold a meeting here was made.
>> I've also suggested that the local hosts may have a more nuanced view 
>> of security here than the international media.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>>
>> McTim
>> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A 
>> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kictanet mailing list
>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>
>> This message was sent to: harry at comtelsys.co.ke Unsubscribe or change 
>> your options at 
>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/harry%40comtelsys
>> .co.ke
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kictanet mailing list
>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>
>> This message was sent to: emailsignet at mailcan.com Unsubscribe or 
>> change your options at 
>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/emailsignet%40mai
>> lcan.com
>>     
> "Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt the ones doing it."
> -old proverb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> This message was sent to: alice at apc.org
> Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alice%40apc.org
>
>