[kictanet] [Fwd: ICANN Nairobi; relocation, relocation?]

Harry Delano harry at comtelsys.co.ke
Sun Feb 14 21:47:50 EAT 2010


Alice,

So where does all this place us...?

Sincerely speaking, am provoked to ask what the local organizing committee
is doing
to make this meeting happen here. 

Are we trying hard enough..? If all these build up point to something
credible, is
KICC the only place where a meeting of this nature can take place..?

Now I do not think ICANN should be blamed at all, if the whole thing is
called off..

Harry

-----Original Message-----
From: kictanet-bounces+harry=comtelsys.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke
[mailto:kictanet-bounces+harry=comtelsys.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke] On
Behalf Of alice
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 4:15 PM
To: harry at comtelsys.co.ke
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
Subject: [kictanet] [Fwd: ICANN Nairobi; relocation, relocation?]

http://crookedtimber.org/2010/02/12/14645/

ICANN Nairobi; relocation, relocation?

by Maria on February 12, 2010

Although I no longer work for ICANN, I'd planned on attending its meeting in
Nairobi <http://nbo.icann.org/> next month to meet old friends and drum up
some work for my new consulting business. The Nairobi meeting is scheduled
to run from 7-12 March. The biggest issue on the table is a crucial stage in
the addition of new top level domains; the vote by the Board on how to
handle expressions of interest. 
But in the last 24 hours, ICANN's COO, Doug Brent, has published a security
warning <http://nbo.icann.org/meetings/security-information-11feb10-en.htm>
that may result in the meeting being cancelled.

If this happens, it will be a real blow for the Kenyan Internet community. A
previously planned meeting in Nairobi was cancelled because of security
concerns prompted by election violence a couple of years ago. I thought this
was the wrong call at the time, as election violence tends to die down and
our meeting wasn't till several months later. But I didn't question and
don't envy the people who have to make that decision.

An ICANN meeting brings about 1200 people from around the world to a country
chosen from host applications about a year in advance. It's a mix between a
trade show and a party conference, with endless parallel sessions,
soap-boxing, hallway deal-making and late night drinking. 
Probably two thirds One third (thanks, Kieren
<http://public.icann.org/meeting-participation-data>) of the participants
are regulars, and there's always a 'back to school' feeling on the first day
as you greet people you've not seen in months with an enthusiasm that wears
off in about a nanosecond. The dominance of the regulars causes ongoing
criticism that the whole travelling circus doesn't work to get more and
different people to take part, and should halt its global peregrinations and
stay put in L.A., Frankfurt or Singapore.

It's expensive to take part in person, but however much resources are put
into it, the number of remote participants is always disappointing. 
The in-person meetings have an uneasy mix of lobbyists, volunteers (many of
whom are self-styled volunteers and in fact make their living from ICANN
activities), beleagured staff members, G-men, NGO types, ccTLD reps,
techies, salesmen, and confused-looking locals. Like it or loathe it, the
travelling ICANN meeting is a big deal for the local hosts and the Internet
community of the country and region it's in. It's their moment to come
together as a group and strut their stuff on the global stage.

The latest security warning about Nairobi concerns a known threat, the
possibility of a terrorist attack by Al-Shabaab, a Somalia based Islamist
insurgency group. The group has said it will attack if Kenya supports the
Somali Transitional Federal Government. The UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
put out a warning
<http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/travel-advice-by-country/
sub-saharan-africa/kenya1>
in December 2009 that terrorist attacks throughout Kenya remain a high risk,
but that only non-essential travel to near the Somali border is to be
avoided. Like London, New York or Washington DC, Nairobi functions admirably
despite a constant threat of terrorism. However, the US State Department has
just issued a specific warning about possible suicide attacks on the
Kenyatta Conference Centre where the meeting will be held. It says the
individuals planning on carrying out attacks have been living in Somali
communities within Kenya since early February.

Although the Board just voted a couple of weeks ago to go ahead with the
Nairobi meeting despite the more general security concerns, the latest
warning has re-opened this tough question. Ultimately, ICANN's CEO and
Chairman must weigh up the risk of bringing over a thousand people to a
potential terrorist target. Their decision isn't simple as that sounds. 
Chances are, no attacks will happen and the meeting will be a success. 
But I suspect the maxim 'if we cancel it, the terrorists have already won'
has a lot more rhetorical than practical weight if you're the person on
whose conscience the safety of hundreds of people will sit.

The Nairobi meeting is hugely important to the people directly involved, in
a way I'm finding hard to articulate. As well as the official programme,
endless meetings and interactions will take place that are very important to
the African and indeed the global Internet community. 
The solidarity and awareness of what it takes to keep the Internet going in
different parts of the world grows from talking and sitting side by side for
hours in endless technical workshops and council meetings. It can't be got
any other way. Or put it another way, if the meeting gets moved to ICANN's
home base in Los Angeles, lots of people who would have come won't be able
to. Not least because of visa problems. If ICANN Nairobi has to be
cancelled, the loss in the Internet community's regional momentum and global
amity will be great.

Over the years, I've heard a lot of carping - from mostly American community
members, I have to admit - about ICANN going to high-crime places like Sao
Paolo, Delhi or Mexico City. In my experience, the non-Americans in the
Internet community are markedly sanguine about visiting visiting poor and
potentially dangerous places. When we cancelled Nairobi last time round, the
Kenyans had to more or less button their anger and disappointment to stay in
the game. But it's infuriating to be told by people you work with that they
can't possibly risk themselves in a city you live in year round. However,
there is a qualitative difference between visiting a city with a lot of
crime against property and one where you may be a live target.

As a nonprofit with a public interest mission and a healthy contingency
fund, relocating the meeting will hurt ICANN, but not mortally. I'm sure as
I write that the meetings team is triggering its contingency plans to hold
the meeting elsewhere if needed. It can be done. I just hope it doesn't have
to be, and that more information about the security threat means fore-warned
is fore-armed.

Already, a couple of companies have pulled their people regardless. 
That's their choice. But if the meeting goes ahead, I for one will be going
to Nairobi.


--------------------------------

> Harry, all;
>
> This seems to be the latest update:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:47 AM,  <no-reply at icann.org> wrote:
>   
>> Updated Security Information as of 11 February 2010
>> Date:
>> Thursday, 11 February 2010
>>
>> Dear ICANN Community,
>>
>> Within the last 24 hours, we received an unclassified report from the
United States' Department of State related to the Kenyatta International
Conference Center, the venue for our upcoming meeting (attached below).
>>
>> The types of threats outlined in that communication are difficult to
assess. ICANN is now reaching out to different parties in Kenya and
elsewhere to see if it is possible to better assess the situation, and of
course will share any further information with you.
>>
>> Sammy Buruchara, Chairman of the ICANN 2010 Local Steering Committee in
Nairobi has already provided the following information:
>>
>>    "In relation with the Security threat by Al Shabaab to US Embassy and
KICC, I wish to on behalf of ICANN 2010 Local Organizing committee and on
behalf of the relevant Kenya Government Security Agencies state the
following:
>>
>>    The Kenya Government is aware of the Security Threat by Al Shabaab on
KICC and on the United States Embassy in Nairobi. Our security organs that
include National Security Intelligence Service (NSIS) and Kenya
Anti-Terrorism Police have been alerted and will make appropriate security
responses to deal with this threat. Through their network of security
agents, they have made contingency plans to thwart any possible terrorist
plot that will target Nairobi City, including  KICC and all the Hotels in
which delegates will be hosted, and the US Embassy.
>>
>>    I wish to assure ICANN Community that the Kenya Government is
committed to ensure your safety during the ICANN event and will take
necessary security measures to guarantee the safety of all participants
during the Conference."
>>
>> In the most transparent manner possible, ICANN will continue to share
information as it becomes available. Just like you, we're processing this
information, and seeing how and if we need to update procedures and plans
for the upcoming meeting.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> ICANN
>>
>> Information from U.S. State Department
>>
>> "As of early February 2010, individuals affiliated with al-Shabaab
al-Islamiya were planning suicide bombing attacks on the US Embassy and
Kenyan International Conference Center in Nairobi, Kenya.  The individuals
were targeting the KICC because it was deemed the largest and oldest
building associated with the Kenyan government.  The US Embassy was targeted
for its support of the Kenyan government.  As of early February, the
individuals planning to carry out the attacks were living in Somali
communities in Kenya.  We have no additional information regarding the
possible individuals involved in the plot, timing, or method of the attack.
>>
>> This is all the information we have at this time, and we will continue to
keep you updated if there are any potential updates."
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   







_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

This message was sent to: harry at comtelsys.co.ke
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/harry%40comtelsys.co.ke





More information about the KICTANet mailing list