[kictanet] Vandalism menace

Vitalis Olunga volunga at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 13 18:32:36 EAT 2010


It is high time the Regulator to start seriuoly to work on the infrastrure shring policy guidelines.  This can be one of the appraoches reduce the probability of sabotage. Sabotage is unethical practice that should not be thought of in the first place.

Regards

VKO




________________________________
From: Mwangi Wamae <mwangi.wamae at gmail.com>
To: volunga at yahoo.com
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Sent: Tue, February 9, 2010 6:12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Vandalism menace


I can think of four reasons why cable vandalism would occur:
	1. Malicious – cable theft:  The thief benefits primarily from reselling the metal (is fibre ever resold/).
	2. Malicious – corporate sabotage:  The thief’s organization will benefit from the service woes of a competitor.
	3. Benign – construction work:  Someone digging a foundation, trench or similar inadvertently severs a cable.
	4. Benign – accident: An unforeseeable event occurs that damages the cable.
I don’t have data about the breakdown of the incidences into these four categories.  I believe we need to collect real data first before prescribing a solution.  However here are my thoughts about how we should address each of these if the incidence warrants it.
	1. Cable theft:  This is petty thievery; we already have enough statutes in our books to address the perpetrators.  The recent ban on the export of scrap metal may have helped – the decline in copper prices may have helped more but prices have been recovering.
	2. Corporate sabotage:  We need a level competitive playing field and if there is corporate sanctioned sabotage against competitors then the perpetrating company should have some real sanctions including imprisonment for guilty executives and possibly even the loss of their licenses.  Telkom in recent press reports seems to be strongly alluding that this is what is going on.
	3. Construction work:  In Connecticut, (and many other parts of the US), it is the law to call a hotline 48-hours before digging.  A joint effort by all the utilities & municipalities in the state (water, electricity, telecoms, sewerage, gas etc) is responsible for coming out to your site and marking where the underground utilities are buried.  (There is a call centre to field the calls!)  Failure to do so has real consequences on the contractor if there is damage to utilities.
	4. Accidents:  Nothing we can do here.
I am shaking my head in disbelief at the suggestion that any of these (that does not result in death or injury) may even be construed to be a capital crime.  Are we really going to hang people for severing a strand of glass fibre?

On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Kai Wulff <kai.wulff at kdn.co.ke> wrote:

It is not only punishment.. Fiber police .. Well how many people do you want to deploy all over the country?
> 
> 
>What is lacking is understanding and respect 
> 
>When it comes to vandals .. If it was their child needing medical assistance and the call does not go through because of a cable cut ….
> 
>Contractors (Road, Water and other industries ..) they regard fiber not as an important infrastructure .. So why bother to avoid damage ..
> 
>Property owners  ….. Cutting the fiber and then complaining about the Internet being down ..
> 
> 
>Building owners asking for rent for fiber to be terminated … Are they getting paid rent by KPLC, TKL, Water …
> 
> 
>Education should solve the problem ….
> 
> 
>Last category: Saboteurs .. TREASON
> 
>Von:kictanet-bounces+kai.wulff=kdn.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke [mailto:kictanet-bounces+kai.wulff=kdn.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke] Im Auftrag von Kevin
>Gesendet: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 17:50
>An: kai.wulff at kdn.co.ke
>
>Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
>Betreff: Re: [kictanet] Vandalism menace 
> 
>Jevans,
> 
>I totally agree with you. I think to answer Dr. Ndemo's question, why not classify the fiber optic infrastructure as "Critical National Communication Infrastructure" and make vandalism a capital offence without the option of a fine. in the same vein, IP network providers should work together to defend the infrastructure as one entity and jointly safeguard the multi-billion shilling investment instead of fighting media wars for individual benefit.
> 
>A joint national anti-vandalism education campaign would be a good start. Not all fiber vandals in the rural and urban areas understand the risk of their actions, especially since they don't see how the fiber crossing their village is benefiting them directly. For all they know, it only serves the rich people living in the towns where the fiber is heading. Villagers need to own the fiber. How?
> 
>1. By fiber companies ensuring that there are digital centres in the villages where the fiber is passing for villagers to see its benefits (just like power cables;cut power cables in village= no power=darkness,no TV=no development).
> 
>2. Establishing a fiber police unit!
> 
> 
>Any other suggestions good people??
>
> 
>On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Jevans Nyabiage <jnyabiage at nation.co.ke> wrote:
>Should this not be made a capital offence? Which of these competitors cannot afford just Sh1 million?
>
>The Kenya Communications (Amendment) Act says any person found guilty of cable vandalism is liable to five-year jail term or a fine of Sh1 million.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: kictanet-bounces+jnyabiage=nation.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke [mailto:kictanet-bounces+jnyabiage=nation.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke] On Behalf Of bitange at jambo.co.ke
>Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 5:11 PM
>To: Jevans Nyabiage
>Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
>Subject: Re: [kictanet] Vandalism menace
>Henry,
>If today you had the power that the Government has, what is the something you would do to these thieves?
>
>Ndemo.
>
>
>Sent from my BlackBerry(r)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Henry Okatch <hokatch at gmail.com>
>Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:16:38
>To: <bitange at jambo.co.ke>
>Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions<kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
>Subject: Re: [kictanet] Vandalism menace
>
>_______________________________________________
>kictanet mailing list
>kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
>This message was sent to: bitange at jambo.co.ke
>Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/bitange%40jambo.co.ke
>
>_______________________________________________
>kictanet mailing list
>kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>This message was sent to: jnyabiage at nation.co.ke
>Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jnyabiage%40nation.co.ke
>DISCLAIMER: The information contained in or accompanying this e-mail is intended for the use of the stated recipient only.  It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
>
>Any views or opinions presented herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Nation Media Group.
>‘To get all breaking news alerts send the word BREAK to 6667 or visit http://mobile.nation.co.ke/ to read news on your mobile phone.’
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>kictanet mailing list
>kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
>This message was sent to: wanjalak at gmail.com
>Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/wanjalak%40gmail.com
> 
>_______________________________________________
>kictanet mailing list
>kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
>This message was sent to: mwangi.wamae at gmail.com
>Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangi.wamae%40gmail.com
>
>



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20100213/1957eb60/attachment.htm>


More information about the KICTANet mailing list