[kictanet] blackberry a threat to national security?.......U.A.E. Puts the Squeeze on BlackBerry
Alice Munyua
alice at apc.org
Mon Aug 2 23:58:39 EAT 2010
U.A.E. Puts the Squeeze on Black Berry
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704702304575402493300698912.html
Government Cites National-Security Concerns as It Bans Email, IM and Web
Services in Battle Over Access to User
By MARGARET COKER in Abu Dhabi, TIM FALCONER in Dubai and PHRED DVORAK
in Toronto
BlackBerry email, instant-messaging and Web-browsing services soon will
be banned in the United Arab Emirates, regulators said, citing a dispute
with the device's maker about how it handles electronic data.
The U.A.E. market is relatively small for Canada's Research In Motion
Ltd., which makes the BlackBerry smartphone. But the suspension of data
service comes amid unease by at least one other government, India, over
the inability to monitor or review electronic communications on the
device in criminal, terrorist or national-security investigations.
And a Saudi Arabian official said Sunday that regulators there ordered
telecommunications companies to block BlackBerry IM services later this
month, according to Zawya Dow Jones. The official didn't explain the
decision.
At the heart of the battle is access to the data transmitted by
BlackBerrys. RIM processes the information through a handful of secure
Network Operations Centers around the world, meaning that most
governments can't access the data easily on their own. The U.A.E.
worries that because of jurisdictional issues, its courts couldn't
compel RIM to turn over secure data from its servers, which are outside
the U.A.E. even in a national-security situation, a person familiar with
the situation said.
The U.A.E. ban is the latest in a string of skirmishes world-wide for
RIM as governments try to monitor and control communications. Kuwait,
India and China are among countries that have asked RIM for easier data
access as a condition for operating within their borders.
The U.A.E. ban, due to start Oct. 11, was the result of the "failure of
ongoing attempts, dating back to 2007, to bring BlackBerry services in
the U.A.E. in line with U.A.E. telecommunications regulations," the
country's Telecommunications Regulatory Authority said Sunday. The ban
doesn't affect telephone and text-messaging services.
"BlackBerry data is immediately exported offshore, where it's managed by
a foreign, commercial organization. BlackBerry data services are
currently the only data services operating in the U.A.E. where this is
the case," the agency said. "Today's decision is based on the fact that,
in their current form, certain BlackBerry services allow users to act
without any legal accountability, causing judicial, social and
national-security concerns."
RIM, based in Waterloo, Ontario, didn't comment on the U.A.E. ban.
The U.A.E. acted after RIM refused to set up a proxy server in the
country as required by its 2007 contract with telecom provider Emirates
Telecommunications Corp., a majority of which is owned by the
government, according to the person familiar with the situation.
RIM last month offered to allow the government access to the
communications of 3,000 of its roughly 500,000 U.A.E.-based BlackBerry
clients, including email, text messages and IM communications, the
person said. But the U.A.E. declined the offer, the person said.
The government doesn't plan to ban smartphones made by the company's two
global competitors, Nokia Corp. and Apple Inc., said one of the people
familiar with the situation.
RIM, which has about 46 million subscribers world-wide, is unusual among
cellphone makers in that BlackBerrys, which were initially designed for
corporate users, come with a high level of security built in. The
messages are encrypted on the device before being sent and remain
encrypted until they reach their destination. The messages are processed
at one of RIM's Network Operations Centers, the principal one of which
is in Canada. The NOCs use proprietary technology, making it difficult
for outsiders to hack in.
Smartphones from other companies don't have the same centralized control
over email or data transmissions and don't come preloaded with the same
level of propriety security technology as Black Berrys do.
The centralized structure makes BlackBerry communications more secure,
said Jonathan Zittrain, a professor of law and computer science at
Harvard University. But the structure also creates a tempting target for
governments, which see the possibility of getting access to a large pool
of information through RIM, he said.
And while RIM cooperates with governments on requests for
national-security-related data that pass through its servers, it can't
be forced to relinquish information from servers that aren't in a
particular government's jurisdictions, Prof. Zittrain said. A government
has more leverage if the servers are within its borders.
"If you've got a NOC there, the government can say 'We're shutting down
the power. We're posting guards at your door,' " Prof. Zittrain said.
Another person familiar with the matter said a key worry for U.A.E.
officials was that BlackBerry's IM service was effectively untraceable.
That could be a problem if RIM resisted handing over data sought by the
U.A.E. "If the U.A.E. government needs this information, for criminal
cases, they are unable to access it because the culprits used BlackBerry
messenger service," the person said.
A senior Indian official last week said BlackBerry's encryption makes
monitoring of its network impossible and creates a security threat. The
Indian government, which is negotiating with RIM, has warned the company
that its operations will be closed unless the company addresses the
concerns.
The U.A.E.'s carriers—Emirates Telecommunications, known as Etisalat,
and Emirates Integrated Telecommunications Co.—said they would comply
with the ban.
The ban is the latest twist in a long-running battle between the U.A.E.
and RIM. Last year, RIM notified BlackBerry users in the nation that an
application Etisalat had told its clients was a technical upgrade was
actually spyware. Users who downloaded the patch had complained of
disruption in email and other services. Etisalat subsequently offered
directions on disabling the software.
More information about the KICTANet
mailing list