[kictanet] Day 12 of 12 -- BPO Discussions, Wrapping Up???

[Walubengo J]

David et al,

Ok. for once I dont know what to say.  But only recall that when two bulls begin to fight it is the grass that suffers.   I dont think this is the kind of "wrapping up" that Nyaki meant when she wrote the above subject line.

So maybe the two can agree to meet offline and continue the discussion on if, how and why the money was returned?  Unless ofcourse the Listers want that discussion - in which case it must be formally requested, scheduled and moderated.

walu.

--- On Thu, 6/18/09, David Otwoma <otwomad at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: David Otwoma <otwomad at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Day 12 of 12 -- BPO Discussions, Wrapping Up
> To: jwalu at yahoo.com
> Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>, kictanet-bounces+bitange=jambo.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 3:38 PM
> Dear Dr. Ndemo,
>  
> With all due respect, you appear to lose me
> here.
>  
> The partial statement you qoute below comes from http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/-/539552/608168/-/item/1/-/3te68rz/-/index.html
> 
>  
> As regards, formal apology, please let me know if it
> is to be directed to:-
>  
> (a) your person (individual),
>  
> (b) your official capacity,
>  
> (c) organizers of the just ended BPO discussion,
>  
> (d) Kicktanet list owners and listers, 
>  
> (e) all the above or more than one of the above.
>  
> The above is without prejudice and as the case(s) may
> be will be addressed accordingly.
>  
> Finally, and if your permit, on appropriate forum we
> may debate the reasons monies are returned/recalled to
> Treasury year in year out.  Is it by accident or design?
> 2009 its famine. 2008 it was IDPs. ......1999 it was
> drought....1991 it was land clashes. Is it by accident or
> design? 
> 
>  
> Kind regards,
>  
> David
> 
> 
>  
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:40 AM,
> <bitange at jambo.co.ke>
> wrote:
> 
> David,
> You very clearly stated "in ICT there seems to be
> laxity" where 500 nillion is being returned to
> Treasury.  The story very clearly states the reason why
> Treasury had to reallocate the budget.
> 
> 
> The motives in your earlier post were not good because you
> are in a postion to know better and you should.  I actually
> expect a formal apology.
> 
> 
> Ndemo.
> 
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry®
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From: David Otwoma <otwomad at gmail.com>
> 
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:49:42
> To: <bitange at jambo.co.ke>
> 
> 
> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions<kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Day 12 of 12 -- BPO Discussions,
> Wrapping Up
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> 
> 
> This message was sent to: bitange at jambo.co.ke
> Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/bitange%40jambo.co.ke
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> 
> This message was sent to: jwalu at yahoo.com
> Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com
>