[kictanet] State Wrong on Internet Exchange Point , is it true

[emmanuel.khisa at kadet.co.ke]

Antony,

Noted!I however drew kenic in to emphasize the need to direct our priorities in the right places and therefore opined that the government is best served levelling the platform for the domain market instead of spending resources trying to duplicate roles already being played by KIXP by founding GIXP... Which my taxes will pay for by the way..where are our priorities


Sent from my BlackBerry®

-----Original Message-----
From: gachuhi anthony <gachuhi.anthony at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:20:19 
To: Emmanuel Khisa<Emmanuel.khisa at kadet.co.ke>
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions<kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Subject: Re: [kictanet] State Wrong on Internet Exchange Point , is it true

Emmanuel,

i think Barack is on KIXP and not kenic.

Kenic = domains , Kixp = exchange point internal bgsp or sharing of local
traffic.

regards
Anthony

On Sun, Dec 28, 1986 at 6:11 PM, Emmanuel Khisa
<Emmanuel.khisa at kadet.co.ke>wrote:

>  I agree with Barrack on this one… I wonder wouldn’t  it make more prudent
> sense to liberalise (away from the current Kenic monopoly) the Kenya ccTLD
> and have it open to other entrepreneurs? I am not sure there is any reason
> why a cartel should retain the right to run this critical resource at the
> expense of other Kenyans. Is it just me or someone else also sees the
> illogic of charging Ksh. 3000 for a domain in an era where other domain
> names are available for as little as Ksh.500. I know this has been said in
> this forum but isn’t it time action was taken…Dr. PS?
>
>
>
> I believe this would make more sense than to have duplication of Exchange
> points at the expense of the taxpayers…Someone enlighten this forum.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Oloo Khisa.
>
>
>
> *From:* kictanet-bounces+emmanuel.khisa=kadet.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke[mailto:
> kictanet-bounces+emmanuel.khisa <kictanet-bounces%2Bemmanuel.khisa>=
> kadet.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke] *On Behalf Of *Barrack Otieno
> *Sent:* Monday, December 28, 2009 5:37 PM
> *To:* emmanuel.khisa at kadet.co.ke
> *Cc:* KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
> *Subject:* [kictanet] State Wrong on Internet Exchange Point , is it true
>
>
>
> Listers,
>
> I was  going through an article in the East African standard with the above
> mentioned title by the CEO of  KIXP published on Sunday Dec  2009 in the
> East African Standard, am  wondering is there a business case other than the
> security considerations highlighted  that justifies the GIXP and if we could
> be allowed to access it or is it classified info?, in addition the writer
> has mentioned the Strengths of KIXP however i would also appreciate to know
> the weaknesses since they might justify the need for GIXP bearing in mind
> the fact that we are just coming out of the woods in so far as monopolies
> are concerned as i try to digest the article in any case having gone through
> http://www.bgp4.as/internet-exchanges it is evident there are a few
> developed countries with more that one Exchange point eg South Africa , the
> US, Sweden, Singapore, Russia and the UK, somebody educate me.
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Barrack O. Otieno
> Administrative Manager
> Afriregister Ltd (Ke)
> P.o.Box 21682
> Nairobi 00100
> Tel:
> +254721325277
> +254733206359
> +254202498789
> Riara Road, Bamboo Lane
> www.afriregister.com
> www.afriregister.co.ke
> ICANN accredited registrar.
> Skype: barrack.otieno
>
>_______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> This message was sent to: gachuhi.anthony at gmail.com
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/gachuhi.anthony%40gmail.com
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20091228/1c4f8c9b/attachment.htm>