[kictanet] IG Discussions- Day 3 of 10: Infrastructure Issues-Submarine Cables

Wed Apr 29 08:19:51 EAT 2009

Morning all,

Actually, we had two days to discuss the impact on the undersea cables on Access, Affordability, Content and Quality.  So lets hear more views...

I know Yawe has written and published widely about this but no harm summarising.  Also, with regard to Quality, I wish to retain my earlier submission that there are issues with the internal networks run by our telcos. Numerous technical evidence exists on the skunkwork list - the local techies lists - and they may wish to share in not so technical terms...As for Affordability, the jury is still out there and we shall indeed know who is fooling who over the next 12mths.

Lets hear more views on this today and prepare to move onto a new theme tomorrow on the Management of Critical Internet Resources (IPv6, top level domain, National IXPs - dont be scared by the technical jargon, will break it down for you)

walu.

--- On Tue, 4/28/09, Faima Basly <fbasly1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Faima Basly <fbasly1 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] IG Discussions- Day 2 of 10: Infrastructure Issues-Submarine Cables
> To: jwalu at yahoo.com
> Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
> Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 12:21 PM
> Dear Listers,
> 
> Good morning. I am happy to hear that it is raining in
> Kenya!
> 
> Mine are observations that I have gathered from one or two
> fora that I think
> may be of interest.
> 
> Access - If this is looked at purely from an individual
> perspective then it
> will be seen as low (Score 1) and clearly not realize the
> benefits of having
> an undersea cable at all. There are already signs of high
> demand for
> increased bandwidth if complaints from consumers today are
> anything to go
> by. This must then feed the notion that with the undersea
> cable will find
> ready users albeit of the corporate and SOHO ( Small office
> home office)
> variety. This then in the appropriately competitively
> structured market will
> trickle down to Apartment buildings and soon into Suburbs.
> 
> Further more with clever government subsidies targeting
> structured learning
> institutions ( schools, universities, libraries) habit will
> be built and
> carried over and soon demand hopefully will match supply.
> 
> I think with the proliferation of lower cost high end
> Mobile Phones into
> Africa and the readily available Chinese wannabe models,
> Access will be
> readily facilitated . This may not speak much for computer
> literacy but that
> may be the price that we have to pay.
> 
> Affordability : This will be relative in my opinion. It
> will be two fold.
> >From the perspective of the provider and from that of
> the user.  I am
> certain the providers have their numbers worked out and it
> will now just be
> a matter of waiting for the uptake from the consumers end. 
> And the end of
> it all is unless one is running a BPO or a Media House it
> will be rather
> interesting to see how business will respond to better
> priced internet
> bandwidth when their main stay is emails? Even in the
> developed world the
> internet is being curtailed during working hours as a
> result of the
> distraction that work causes to staff who are busy on face
> book and chat. In
> some extreme cases because of availability of internet on
> mobilephones some
> employers are banking phones till tea break and lunch time,
> as all
> communication can go on on email and landlines....So will
> majority of the
> existing business ' jump on the bandwagon' when the
> seacables land? the jury
> is still out on this one......
> 
> Content , here I disagree with the score given (1) this is
> because the
> minute connectivity becomes available  & affordable
> then a lot of sharing
> will begin and we will be pleasantly suprised as to the
> gems that may be
> unlocked. Of course Content will in itself need to be
> shepherded and
> managed, but I beleive I saw a post that alluded to an
> oncoming content
> discussion so will hold my horses. I suspect that 'a
> monkey see monkey do'
> approach will come into play as has been the case in the
> west where content
> is concerned, once people see what it is all about and what
> covers the wide
> scope of content we may as well lead Africa. After All
> Kenya is a reference
> point for many in East, Central and parts of Southern
> Africa and with the
> enterpreneuring spirit we are known for it will only be a
> matter of time. I
> think the score should be a 2.
> 
> 
> 
> Ms Basly
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Sam Gatere
> <sam.gatere at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Walu
> >
> > Interesting ice breaker on the packet exchange
> -Internet- to keep the
> > intellectual   community going!
> >
> > my Initial reactions on Access low impact seems to be
> a fairly accurate
> > since the glorified undersea cables are actually top
> tear and not landing in
> > my house or office! I think this needs to be
> demystified to the end user. In
> > my view possible ways of getting access and broadband
> access to the end user
> > would possibly be facilitated by triple play providers
> such as Zuku who are
> > not only offering Internet and the only product  but
> other infotainment
> > products.
> >
> > On affordability specifically to the Kenyan scenario I
> think the PPP
> > (Public Private Partnership) model would ensure some
> form of Public Good
> > service that safeguards the end user. and cushions
> them from being exploited
> > by infrastructure investors. I would like to site the
> SEACOM venture that
> > has the government and other players such as Safaricom
> who are private
> > investors. As you know Safaricom already offers
> "broadband" Internet
> > services. If they benefit from high speed Internet
> through this SEACOM
> > partnership the end user in this case may actually
> enjoy faster, more
> > reliable Internet access.
> >
> > When we talk about content and local content for that 
> matter...  I think
> > this one is just a sorry or sad state of affairs. I
> agree content should be
> > independent of infrastructure. As for our Local
> Universities developing
> > digital content we need a whole e-education on the
> benefits of digitising
> > knowledge and finding new ways of learning and
> delivering the same....
> >
> > It will be Interesting to hear what others have to
> say.
> >
> >
> >
> > Sam.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:20 AM, John Walubengo
> <jwalu at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Welcome to day 2. Hopefully it would be more
> interactive than
> >> yesterday...I want to believe that the paralysis
> in our politics has not
> >> infected and paralysed us. And just like during
> the cold war, scientists and
> >> technocrats accross the divide continued to
> exchange internet packets
> >> inspite of...
> >>
> >> Nway without too much digression, today we want to
> interrogate several
> >> assumptions about the long awaited submarine
> cable(s) that are poised to hit
> >> our coastal city of Mombasa.  SEACOM, TEAMs, EASsy
> are all expected to be
> >> operational starting July 09 (SEACOM), TEAMS (Sep
> 09) and EASsy (2010?)
> >>
> >> Here's my take/opinion on their impact based
> on a scale of Low(1),
> >> Moderate(2) and High(3)
> >>
> >> i) Access:- Score=1, Low Impact on Access
> >> The undersea cable is a top-tier infrastructure
> that has no impact at the
> >> (User) Access level.  User access level is a
> function of the maturity of the
> >> domestic(local) infrastructure.  Unless this is
> developed proportionately,
> >> we shall have an an awkward situation similar to a
> country with top-notch
> >> Universities (Submarine cable) but no Primary and
> Secondary Schools to
> >> provide the students (no Access)...
> >>
> >> ii) Affordability: Score= 2,Moderate Impact on
> Internet Service Costs.
> >> Yes, the prices are likely to go down from the
> current retail levels of
> >> about 2500USD per 1MB to btwn 500-1000USD per 1MB
> of bandwidth.  But I have
> >> serious doubts if this prices will be sustained at
> these low levels because
> >> the investors in these cables are not in it for
> fun - they have calculated
> >> ROI targets that anticipate a huge uptake of the
> bandwidth.  In the likely
> >> event that this uptake failes to happen, I see
> prices beginning to go up by
> >> the end of the 1st year of the cable operation. 
> The investors in the cable
> >> will then begin to milk the few subscribers who
> may have jumped onto the
> >> highway in order to pay for the cost of the
> capital sunk into the cables.
> >>  Yes, maybe I just cant get over the nasty SAT3 
> experience where the
> >> submarine fiber cable landed in the West African
> region with little impact
> >> on pricing.
> >>
> >> iii) Content: Score=1, Low Impact on Content.
> >> Incidentally, digital content should be
> independent of infrastructure.  I
> >> mean, we do not need the submarine cable for our
> Lecturers at the
> >> universities to have their notes in digital form.
> We do not need the
> >> submarine cable to digitize government records. 
> Content is intricately
> >> related to eventual cost of Internet Service and
> ideally should be fully
> >> developed before the submarine cable.
> >>
> >> iv) Quality. Score=2, Moderate Impact on Internet
> Quality.
> >> "Broadband Quality of Internet" is what
> every service provider is
> >> screaming about. But Broadband standard in .KE is
> way off the mark when
> >> compared to India or Europe. I will remain
> sceptical until proven otherwise
> >> but I forsee the undersea cable having moderate
> impact on quality because of
> >> our poorly managed domestic User and  Telco
> networks. Most Telco networks
> >> that will act as gateways to the submarine cable
> are full of Viruses, Spam,
> >> Proxies, and ill-configured Servers, Routers and
> Switches that introduce
> >> congestion and bottlenecks rather facilate
> broadband access to the Submarine
> >> cable.
> >>
> >> We have today to hear your views on this...and the
> floor is open.
> >>
> >> walu.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> kictanet mailing list
> >> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> >>
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> >>
> >> This message was sent to: sam.gatere at gmail.com
> >> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> >>
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/sam.gatere%40gmail.com
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > kictanet mailing list
> > kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> >
> > This message was sent to: fbasly1 at gmail.com
> > Unsubscribe or change your options at
> >
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/fbasly1%40gmail.com
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> 
> This message was sent to: jwalu at yahoo.com
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com