[kictanet] Media

Fri Feb 15 14:49:06 EAT 2008

I trust then that we can leave it in your capable hands to at least ensure
that the task force consider that structure and the format of the questions
and that they reflect international standards in evaluation procedures.

Permit me to reiterate Edith's comments:

“The  four internationally recognized evaluation standards:

1.     Utility - who are the intended users? The evaluation should serve
the     information needs of intended users, who should be defined from the
outset.
2.     Feasibility - it should be realistic, prudent, diplomatic and
frugal.
3.     Propriety - it should be conducted legally, ethically and with due
regard for the welfare of those involved in the evaluation, as well as
those affected by its results.
4.    Accuracy - it will reveal and convey technically adequate
information     about the features that determine the worth or merit of the
subject     being evaluated.

Lastly, the purpose would need to be clear is it? "on improving rather than
on proving, on understanding rather than on reporting, and on creating
knowledge for action/policy change rather than on taking credit/punishing."

On 15/2/08 4:55 PM, "bitange at jambo.co.ke" <bitange at jambo.co.ke> wrote:

> The format of the questions will be decided by the task force.
> 
> Ndemo
> 
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry®
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Monica Kerretts-Makau <mkmakau at yahoo.co.uk>
> 
> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:02:07
> To:<bitange at jambo.co.ke>
> Cc:'KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions' <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Media
> 
> 
> Dear Dr. Ndemo,
> 
> I have been following the comments on the proposed Media task force:
> 
> While I agree with you that "The task force will collate the widest variety
> of views of both the produces of media......."
> 
> 
> The question raised by Edith re: THE FORMAT OF THE QUESTIONS
> 
> Has not been addressed.
> 
> Is it possible that these valid comments meant to aid in the way the audit
> is undertaken is  structured into the questions?
>  
> Best wishes
> 
> Dr. Monica Kerretts-Makau
> 
> 
> 
> On 15/2/08 11:22 AM, "bitange at jambo.co.ke" <bitange at jambo.co.ke> wrote:
> 
>> Edith,
>> I have taken your views. The Task Force will collate the widest variety of
>> views of both the producers of media content and the consumers ‹ i.e. the
>> practitioners of journalism and the reading, viewing and listening public..
>> It will also take into account the findings and recommendations of other
>> independent audits of media conduct and content placed in the public
>> domain, including the views of Kenya¹s worldwide Diaspora.
>> 
>> The purpose of the study is to assit the Government come up with an
>> appropriate policy intervention.  At the Editors' forum on this subject,
>> Government was criticised for lack of clear ploicy on Information.  I
>> promised a comprehensive review of the ICT Policy which was largely
>> focused on the new media.  We are in this together throughout because I
>> intend to involve stakeholders in coming up with a well informed
>> comprehensive policy framework.
>> 
>> I must admit here that in the past I have enjoyed the discourse in this
>> forum but if we turn it into a name-calling arena, then in my view let
>> Government be Government and activism be what it is.  We have a wonderful
>> opportunity to change the ways things have always been done.
>> 
>> Ndemo.
>> 
>> 
>>> Dr Ndemo,
>>> 
>>> It appears that you're not open to suggestions as much as you seem to ask
>>> for suggestions from your last communication.
>>> 
>>> In other words, I'm suggesting that the purpose of the study and how the
>>> results would be applied be included as part of the TOR. I don't see where
>>> I'm being critical.
>>> 
>>> Kind regards
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: bitange at jambo.co.ke [mailto:bitange at jambo.co.ke]
>>> Sent: 14 February 2008 18:06
>>> To: Edith Adera
>>> Cc: bitange at jambo.co.ke; 'KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions'
>>> Subject: RE: [kictanet] Media
>>> 
>>> Dear Edith,
>>> I can only work within my boundaries.  The Clergy have made their
>>> apologies and practically pre-empted detailed findings as to how they
>>> behaved.  The review of politicians is ongoing and are faced with a
>>> possibility of constitutional and legal changes.  Some investigative
>>> journalist may find it interesting to put all these efforts into
>>> perspective.
>>> 
>>> Rather than criticise, please make recommendations.  I would not be
>>> participating in this forum if I did not want stakeholder views.  The
>>> semantics have nothing to do with the objectives of the exercise.  We
>>> simply want to make informed policy decisions.  We are not
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>> ---------------------------------------------
>> "easy access to the world"
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> kictanet mailing list
>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>> 
>> This message was sent to: mkmakau at yahoo.co.uk
>> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mkmakau%40yahoo.co.uk
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> ---------------------------------------------
> "easy access to the world"
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20080215/f328cfa7/attachment.htm>