[kictanet] Day 1 0f 10:-Internet Governance Discussions, Introductory Theme

[waudo siganga]

Hi Walu, David - I hope in the course of the discussions someone can
paint a clearer picture of the meaning of "critical Internet resources".
The original "narrow definition" of IG was based on this concept but now
I believe no two people in a room can give the same definition although
I see it on the Hyraband Agenda (Agenda Item 4). 

I also hope that at the end of the day we will get some proposals for
alternative IG Models, probably based on the WGIG report proposals:
•       No single Government should have a pre-eminent role in relation
to international Internet governance.
•       The organizational form for the governance function will be
multilateral, transparent and democratic, with the full involvement of
Governments, the private sector, civil society and international
organizations. 
•       The organizational form for the governance function will involve
all stakeholders and relevant intergovernmental and international
organizations within their respective roles

In this connection, another resource is www.wgig.org

Waudo
Former UN-WGIG member


On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:17:54 +0400, "David Otwoma" <otwomad at gmail.com>
said:
> For general information see:
> 
> http://www.intgovforum.org/
> 
> For what Walu is trying to get us engaged in see:
> http://www.intgovforum.org/usgdesa-letter-en.html
> 
> On behalf of the Secretary-General, it is my pleasure to invite you to
> participate in the Third IGF in Hyderabad, India on 3 - 6 December
> 2008.
> 
> The meeting will be open to all World Summit on the information
> Society (WSIS) accredited entities, as well as other institutions and
> persons with proven expertise and experience in matters related to
> Internet governance.
> 
> Following broad-based consultations through the Multi-stakeholder
> Advisory Group (MAG), the proposed agenda for the Third Meeting of the
> IGF will be as follows:
> 
> Reaching the next billion;
> 
> Promoting cyber-security and trust;
> 
> Managing critical Internet resources;
> 
> Taking stock and the way forward;
> 
> Emerging issues - the Internet of tomorrow
> 
> The overall theme of the meeting will be internet for all'.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:56 AM, John Walubengo <jwalu at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > Today we just want to get upto speed with the genesis and rationale for Internet Governance.  Internet Governance issues arose from the increasing  use of the Internet during the mid and late 1990s.  Most countries were surprised at the increasing role the internet was having on their Socio-economic as well as Political landscape. They then realised that lacked the oversight power the US government unilatery enjoyed over the development and use of the Internet resources.
> >
> > Indeed one of the Key questions then as it is now, was why should one Government influence the direction of a global resource without reference to other governments?  The way the Internet was governed was definitely not commensurate with its global reach or nature. A lot of lobbying and pressure particularly from Latin America, Asia Pacific and ITU started agitating for a change in the oversight role the US government had and continues to have over the Internet.  The anti-change proponents however maintained that the current governance structure through the US Dept of Commerce and ICANN is what has given the Internet this phenomenal growth – hence the famous cliché – "If it ain't broken, why try to fix it?"
> >
> > The World Summit on Information Society (WSIS) process was commissioned by UN in the late 1990s to look into this and other emerging issues of the Internet such as the legal, economic and social-cultural dimensions of the Internet. The WSIS process concluded in Tunis, 2005, give no definite rulings on these issues but recommended instead the creation of a multi-stakeholder forum, the IGF – the Internet Governance Forum which continues to study and deliberate on these issues to date. WSIS also supplied the working definition for Internet Governance as:- the development and application by Stakeholders of the rules, norms, procedures and practices that influence the evolution and use of the Internet.
> >
> > The Stakeholders (States, Civil Society, Academia, Media, Businesses, etc) are all actively involved in the Internet Governance Forum with the sole objective of ensuring that their interests are catered for as the Internet continues to evolve. The IGF has so far held two summits, Greece, and Brazil with a 3rd due at the end of this year in India.  The stakeholders propose positions on the emerging and contentious issues that are used to somewhat inform the direction the Internet takes. However, most of Africa continues to sleep as Nations and other stakeholders scramble to claim a stake and positions on what is becoming the most important battle of the 21st Century – the battle for the Information Superhighway.
> >
> > Those with experiences, comments, clarifications, observations or objections have 1day to say something on today's Introductory theme.
> >
> > walu.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > kictanet mailing list
> > kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> >
> > This message was sent to: otwomad at gmail.com
> > Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/otwomad%40gmail.com
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> 
> This message was sent to: emailsignet at mailcan.com
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/emailsignet%40mailcan.com
People make a plan work, a plan alone seldom makes people work (Confucius).