[kictanet] Balancing Act Top Story: THE AFRICAN LAKES SALE – QUESTIONS BEGIN TO PILE UP

alice at apc.org alice at apc.org
Mon Feb 19 08:45:43 EAT 2007


>From Balancing Act

TOP STORY: THE AFRICAN LAKES SALE – QUESTIONS BEGIN TO PILE UP
_____________________________________________________________________

The sale of African Lakes (the owner of pan-African ISP Africa Online)
has had more twists and turns than a Grand Prix race-track. Everyone
involved – those selling the company and the two potential buyers –
probably only agree on one thing: the sale ought to have been done by
now. Russell Southwood looks at the lengthening number of questions
emerging from this deal not yet done.

On 28 January 2007 in issue 340 we announced erroneously that African
Telecoms Company (ATC) had secured 52.66% of African Lakes and increased
its offer to £18.50 a share, giving the deal a total value of GBP5.04
million.

So in one corner you have African Telecoms Company, a grouping that
includes Richard Bell, Kenyan ISP Wananchi, several local Kenyan
investors and the US Schneider Media and Holding Group.

And in the other corner is South African incumbent telco Telkom that is
trying to put together a regional acquisitions strategy that will equip
it to face a competitive future. True to form, it refused to say what it
was doing: “The reports linking Telkom SA as a bidder for Africa Online
are speculative and Telkom will not comment on media speculation”.
Telkom had made no public offer at this point despite having been in
discussion since an earlier point in 2006. The African Lakes Board did
not recommended the ATC offer on the basis that it could obtain more
money for shareholders from another bidder, the as-yet-unnamed Telkom.

In the third corner is African Lakes that is chaired by David
Montgomery, whose main claim to fame has been cutting the cost base of
the UK’s Mirror Newspapers after the death of Robert Maxwell.

ATC thought it had secured victory because it had acquired an
“irrevocable” on the shares of one of the key shareholders, RAB Capital
(18.9% of the total shareholding at that point). On 8 February ATC
formally issued notice of its increased offer. The offer expires on 23
February.

This triggered two things: a frantic scramble by ATC and African Lakes
to sign up shareholders to their cause and the need for the somewhat
indecisive Telkom to issue a public bid.

In its 12 February press release announcing the Telkom bid African Lakes
said it had “received strong support for it from shareholders holding
more than 60% of the voting rights of the Company. Unfortunately the
Panel ruled on Friday that of this number shareholders holding 18.9% of
the voting rights cannot have their support counted in favour of the
Telkom disposal as their voting rights have passed to ATC as a
consequence of them accepting the ATC Offer prior to the Board
concluding its negotiations for the Telkom Disposal. Furthermore,
attempts by these shareholders to have their acceptances withdrawn were
also deemed invalid under the conditions of the ATC Offer”.

The Telkom offer was for what was claimed would be £25 per share,
valuing the deal at £9.72m. But it emerged on 15 February that as it
would only be buying what must be the controlling Africa Online Company
– Africa Online (Mauritius) - it would not be dealing with the historic
liabilities of African Lakes as a company.

These would be dealt with using the cash from the deal and shareholders
would be paid on liquidation of the African Lakes Company. Shareholders
were assured that the offer figure of £25 a share had been based on a
company audit of liabilities. On the same day it issued a correction
saying an audit of liabilities had not been completed. Indeed a review
of liabilities had only been started.

The fight to gain shareholder acceptances was clearly getting tight as
on 14 February African Lakes issued a notice saying that it had
exercised various share options and issued more share to T Hoare
Nominees, Lesley Davey and Paul West: the latter two are both senior
Managers of African Lakes and Board members. Furthermore it issued
shares to African Lakes employee, George Ezzat. On being rung by a
member of the ATC consortium, it is alleged that Ezzat was unaware that
the shares had been issued to him.

This has been a dense and often complicated struggle for the company and
in the interests of comprehension we have sought to summarise events
above. But the number of questions that need answering just keeps
getting longer:

- If there is no audit of African Lakes’ liabilities, how can the
company say with any confidence what the final outcome price of the
Telkom offer will be to its shareholders?

- What were the circumstances in which shares were issued to George
Ezzat? Why (as alleged) did Ezzat know nothing about this share option
issue when asked about it by an ATC shareholder? Why were additional
share options granted during what was clearly an offer period when at
least two offers were being publicly discussed?

- It is not clear what number of subscribers Africa Online has but it is
certain that it has fewer than the figures named in the last publicly
available documents. What is the number and what is the Average Revenue
Per User? It is one thing for a group of private investors to take a
risk of this magnitude but how does a publicly quoted company like
Telkom think that it will make a return on the purchase price?

What expertise does Telkom have to run a pan-African retail ISP in
competitive environments? What has been the success of its existing
pan-African connectivity sales operations?

Africa Online has the potential to become a pan-African player in the
new competitive landscape that includes both voice and data. But it will
need determined and experienced management capable of investing more
than the purchase price to take it from where it is now to a successful
future. Faced with these two potential buyers, who would you choose to
carry out this task?
____________________________________________________________________





More information about the KICTANet mailing list