[kictanet] Call for input into Election Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2017 and Election Offences (Amendment) Bill 2017

Barrack Otieno otieno.barrack at gmail.com
Thu Oct 5 14:40:51 EAT 2017


Colleagues,

you may watch the presentation here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxY5GMx3IhQ

Best Regards

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:03 PM, S.M. Muraya via kictanet <
kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:

> Kanini,
>
> Check paragraph 257 on page 107 of the Supreme Court majority ruling..
>
> "Was he in the same vein also admitting that not *all* Forms 34A had been
> electronically transmitted to the National Tallying Centre from the polling
> centres as required by law?"
>
> Paragraph 258: "not scanning all Forms 34A and simultaneously transmitting
> them to the NTC"
>
> Paragraph 260 (b) Whether all the Forms 34A had been electronically
> transmitted from the polling stations to the National
> Tallying Centre.
>
> Paragraphs 262-266 - further emphasizing of electronic transmission, no
> sane person is bound to ignore.
>
>
> Not sure how the Supreme Court complied with Article 159(2)(d) of the
> Constitution, but it seems like FOUR Supreme Court judges chose to focus on
> the procedural technicalities.. the scanning + electronic transmission of
> *ALL* form 34a's to the National Tallying Centre, before the announcement
> of results.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:45 PM, kanini mutemi <kaninimutemi at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I get the gist but yes I think there's an error in reporting. The correct
>> position in my view:
>> 1.  Electronic transmission is the bedrock
>> 2. Guidelines on use of the electronic system extend to setting up a
>> complementary system
>> 3. IEBC should set up a complementary system for transmission.
>>
>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 at 20:38 S.M. Muraya <murigi.muraya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Kanini,
>>>
>>> Do you see any problem (conflict) with the statements below? (could be
>>> journalistic error)
>>>
>>> http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2017/09/iebc-directed-deploy
>>> -alternative-oct-17-case-technology-fails/
>>>
>>> Sep 20 – The Supreme Court has directed the Independent Electoral and
>>> Boundaries Commission (IEBC) to put in place a complementary system for the
>>> fresh October 17 presidential poll, in compliance with Section 44A of the
>>> Elections Act.
>>>
>>> Chief Justice David Maraga said the court could not simply overlook the
>>> negation of guidelines on the use of technology in the transmission of
>>> results saying the electronic transmission was the bedrock upon which the
>>> new election laws passed by the bi-cameral Parliament were anchored.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:12 PM, kanini mutemi via kictanet <
>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The current Section 44A of the Elections Act allows IEBC to set up a
>>>> *complementary* system for transmission of results. I believe that
>>>> should take care of those instances. What the Bill proposes is to have two
>>>> parallel systems where the manual is superior.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 at 20:01 S.M. Muraya via kictanet <
>>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If electronic transmission of results is the only prescribed option in
>>>>> the current act, then an amendment is now inevitable ):
>>>>>
>>>>> Technology firms have indicated, it may not be possible to
>>>>> electronically transmit all results from all polling stations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Forms 34b, transmitted from the Constituency tallying center are
>>>>> already described as too bulky..
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.nation.co.ke/news/politics/Wafula-Chebukati-outli
>>>>> nes-tough-demands-on-OT-Morpho-/1064-4119384-10rr6uaz/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Further, on plans by the commission to display all the forms 34B from
>>>>> constituencies, the firm says it is technologically impossible to do this
>>>>> given the bulky nature of the forms.DATA CAPACITYMr Chebukati insists that
>>>>> the tech firm should enhance its data capacity to accommodate the bulk
>>>>> data.“Please not that since OT-Morpho are the ones who receive the forms
>>>>> 34A first, they must make them public. Text results without forms, shall
>>>>> not be allowed in whatever circumstances,” he tersely says.He instructs
>>>>> them to avoid a situation that happened in August where some 10,000 polling
>>>>> stations sent results without forms.*
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Barrack Otieno via kictanet <
>>>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Listers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Proposed election amendments make electronic results irrelevant
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In Summary
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Specifically, proposed amendments kill the need to have electronic
>>>>>> results, given that the manual ones are legally authoritative.
>>>>>>  To bury the ICT agenda for good, the amendments propose total
>>>>>> mutilation of Section 44 (use of technology) by deleting subsections
>>>>>> 5, 6, 7 & 8.
>>>>>>  One gets the feeling that these amendments are more geared towards
>>>>>> supporting ICT-illiterate lawyers in the next presidential petition.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> read more:
>>>>>> http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/2274560-41
>>>>>> 24394-k96oxc/index.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/4/17, Lawrence Dinga, CISSP via kictanet
>>>>>> <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>>>> > I completely concur with the views so far.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > It is evident from the current mood of the country that the
>>>>>> amendments to
>>>>>> > the Election Laws are not all inclusive and the general feeling is
>>>>>> that it
>>>>>> > is more of a political game undermining the electoral commission
>>>>>> ahead of
>>>>>> > the repeat presidential elections. As Barrack says, our key
>>>>>> interest is
>>>>>> > promoting the best use of ICT to bring lasting solutions to our
>>>>>> myriad
>>>>>> > problems.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > As we are aware, the contentious issue that led to the
>>>>>> nullification of the
>>>>>> > presidential election was that IEBC refused to open the servers for
>>>>>> scrutiny
>>>>>> > and get the logs for analysis. The reason they were citing is that
>>>>>> servers
>>>>>> > are not located in Kenya and "the custodians were still asleep"
>>>>>> while the
>>>>>> > logs were needed by the Supreme Court. This brings my point of Data
>>>>>> > Protection and Residency Laws in Kenya. (Please I do apologise in
>>>>>> advance
>>>>>> > incase there are any such laws which I am ignorant of). If only
>>>>>> KICTANet
>>>>>> > could engage in such initiatives as to help Kenya in having Data
>>>>>> Protection
>>>>>> > and Residency Laws, then that would solve a lot of problems for the
>>>>>> nation.
>>>>>> > As it turns out, many of us were victims of data privacy violations
>>>>>> in 2013
>>>>>> > when most of us found themselves to be members of various political
>>>>>> parties
>>>>>> > without their knowledge. Technology is changing rapidly and shaping
>>>>>> our ways
>>>>>> > of life and that is why even Europe is replacing the old EU Data
>>>>>> Protection
>>>>>> > Directive which has been there since 1998 with the new legislation
>>>>>> that is
>>>>>> > far more comprehensive than our old Act, the journey that started
>>>>>> way back
>>>>>> > in 2012.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > We can start somewhere by KICTANet initiating stakeholders
>>>>>> workshops to
>>>>>> > educate the public on basic understanding of personal data, what
>>>>>> data
>>>>>> > privacy means to everyone, protecting your digital identity and how
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> > respond to a data breach. This may culminate into some select
>>>>>> committee of
>>>>>> > technology and legal professionals to draft our data protection
>>>>>> regulation.
>>>>>> > I think by this we will have contributed something we can be proud
>>>>>> of as
>>>>>> > KICTANet instead of involving ourselves in a process which is
>>>>>> viewed by many
>>>>>> > Kenyans as not all inclusive and could be having some sinister
>>>>>> motives.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > That is just my opinion
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Regards
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Lawrence Dinga, MSc. (InfoSec & Forensics), CISSP
>>>>>> > Managecom Systems Ltd
>>>>>> > +254 721226324 <0721%20226324>/ 0733973999 <0733%20973999>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > From: Ali Hussein via kictanet
>>>>>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2017 11:57 AM
>>>>>> > To: ldinga at managecom.co.ke
>>>>>> > Cc: Ali Hussein
>>>>>> > Subject: Re: [kictanet] Call for input into Election Laws
>>>>>> (Amendment) Bill,
>>>>>> > 2017 and Election Offences (Amendment) Bill 2017
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I agree with Barrack.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > We may object to some or all of the amendments but we must adhere
>>>>>> to the
>>>>>> > spirit of our new constitution, part of which specifically urges
>>>>>> the Govt
>>>>>> > and the citizenry to engage through public participation. It is also
>>>>>> > critical that we in the sector don’t create a vacuum in this space
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> > nature surely abhors a vacuum.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Ali Hussein
>>>>>> > Principal
>>>>>> > Hussein & Associates
>>>>>> > +254 0713 601113 <0713%20601113>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Twitter: @AliHKassim
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Skype: abu-jomo
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act
>>>>>> but a
>>>>>> > habit."  ~ Aristotle
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Sent from my iPad
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On 4 Oct 2017, at 10:21 AM, Barrack Otieno via kictanet
>>>>>> > <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >   Hi John,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >   I think it is worth commenting otherwise someone else will
>>>>>> comment on
>>>>>> >   our behalf. We have many Kenyans with public interest at heart who
>>>>>> >   contribute towards the many strides this country makes yet we keep
>>>>>> >   reversing the same without thinking through well. We should rise
>>>>>> up in
>>>>>> >   one accord and say no to what is not right for our nation without
>>>>>> fear
>>>>>> >   or favour, i beleive the network is apolitical, our key interest
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> >   promoting the best use of ICT's.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >   Regards
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >   On 10/4/17, John Kieti <jkieti at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     My sense is that the ammendments are rushed if not too
>>>>>> reactionary.
>>>>>> > Also
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     too close to an election (Just days!). As Grace Bomu observes,
>>>>>> there is
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     much we could contribute but with the nature of the process,
>>>>>> you wonder
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     whether its worth putting our valuable time in it.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Barrack Otieno via kictanet <
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       Dear Grace,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       I  object to the amendments . I have gone through the bill
>>>>>> and found
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       some of the amendments to be ill advised. I think we should
>>>>>> always
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       uphold the spirit of the law other than the letter of the
>>>>>> law. For
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       instance when we say that in the event manual transmission
>>>>>> defers
>>>>>> > from
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       electronic transmission the manual transmission will carry
>>>>>> the day
>>>>>> > yet
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       we know basic principles of computing such as Garbage in
>>>>>> Garbage out
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       (GIGO) or What You See is What you get (WYSWYG) it shows that
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       processes and use of electronic system as supplementary aids
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       misunderstood why should we entertain a situation where the
>>>>>> input
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       differs from the output. Electronic aids only make the system
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       efficient and effective they don't alter results unless there
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       interference.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       On another note, we have new members of parliament who are
>>>>>> just being
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       inducted, it would therefore be untrue to claim that they have
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       understood the election management system and processes which
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       taken time  to develop and now want to dismantle it to suit
>>>>>> temporary
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       political interests , i think we should uphold the interests
>>>>>> of the
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       country first and i would urge our elected leaders to be at
>>>>>> the fore
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       front of this effort. The election laws might not be perfect
>>>>>> but it
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       would be prudent to have a consensus based approach of
>>>>>> scrutinizing
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       any weak areas and addressing the same based on merit.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       Finally and in my humble opinion, in as much as we have
>>>>>> deployed
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       technology and used technology to make many advances in
>>>>>> different
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       spheres of our nation, we are yet to fully embrace and
>>>>>> intergrate
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       Information Technology Governance principles and practices in
>>>>>> our
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       institutions be they public or private. I think this is our
>>>>>> archilles
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       heel and this are the issues that might need to be addressed.
>>>>>> We
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       deploy good systems but lack the manners to use the same
>>>>>> correctly
>>>>>> > let
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       alone protect the data under our custody. A data protection
>>>>>> act will
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       help resolve some of this challenges we are trying to resolve
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       politically, the election laws amendment bill is just a red
>>>>>> herring,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       technology is here to stay and will continue affecting every
>>>>>> aspect
>>>>>> > of
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       our lives if we don't address IT, IT will address us
>>>>>> politically and
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       socially sooner than later.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       Regards
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       Best Regards
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       On 10/3/17, Grace Mutung'u (Bomu) via kictanet
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         Hi all,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         There is a lot to say about the substance of the proposed
>>>>>> law but I
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         think
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         the process is ill advised. There should be no amendments
>>>>>> to the
>>>>>> > law
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       given
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         the very limited time period  before the rerun.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         And although we have been invited because we care about
>>>>>> technology,
>>>>>> > I
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       would
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         like to believe that we also care about the nation. We shall
>>>>>> > achieve
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         very
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         little in terms of building trust in our processes and
>>>>>> institutions
>>>>>> > in
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       such
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         a rushed process. Shelve this law.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         On 2 Oct 2017 16:57, "Grace Githaiga via kictanet" <
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Listers
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Greetings!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           KICTANet has been invited on Thursday October 5, 2017, to
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> > meeting of
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           the
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           select committees on Election laws 2017. Considering that
>>>>>> there
>>>>>> > will
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           be
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           many other groups participating, we would like to present
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> > memorandum
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           containing our specific concerns as they pertain to tech
>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Further, we realize that the time is too short to hold a
>>>>>> > moderated
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       debate
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           and therefore would like to hear from you on specific
>>>>>> tech issues.
>>>>>> > We
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           have
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           to do this by *Wednesday October 4, 2017 at** 2 p.m.
>>>>>> *Thereafter,
>>>>>> > I
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           and
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Kanini Mutemi will collate the views in readiness for
>>>>>> Thursday.
>>>>>> > In
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           addition, it would be good for those who participated in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> > KICTANet
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           observation mission on August 8, 2017 to also attend this
>>>>>> > Thursday
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           meeting.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           We attach the two bills, and would like to draw your
>>>>>> attention
>>>>>> > to:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           1. Election Laws (Amendment) Bill
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             - Clause 6 (Electronic AND manual transmission of
>>>>>> presidential
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             election results, with manual taking precedence).
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             - Clause 7 (Substantially amends Section 44 of the
>>>>>> Elections
>>>>>> > Act
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       which
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             prescribes the use of technology in the conduct of
>>>>>> elections).
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             - Clause 8 (Amends Section 44A on use of a complementary
>>>>>> > mechanism
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       for
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             identification of voters).
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             - Clause 9 (Amends Section 83 on the effect of
>>>>>> non-compliance).
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             - Clause 11 (Criminal liability for failing to sign
>>>>>> documents).
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           2. Election Offences (Amendment) Bill-
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             - Clause 2 (Amends Election Offences Act to allow the
>>>>>> government
>>>>>> > to
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             publish advertisements on its achievements during the
>>>>>> election
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           period).
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Kindlyprovide your input by providing which clause you
>>>>>> think is
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           problematic, what your concerns are, and the
>>>>>> recommendations.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Asanteni sana.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Rgds
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Grace
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           -----------------------------
>>>>>> -------------------------------
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           ----------------------
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           *Grace Githaiga*
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Twitter: @ggithaiga
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Skype: gracegithaiga
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gracegithaiga
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           .*..**the most important office in a democracy is the
>>>>>> citizen. So,
>>>>>> > you
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           see, that’s what our democracy demands. It needs
>>>>>> you!----Barrack
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Obama.*
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           kictanet mailing list
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>>>>> > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           mailman/options/kictanet/nmutungu%40gmail.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a
>>>>>> multi-stakeholder
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           platform
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           for people and institutions interested and involved in
>>>>>> ICT policy
>>>>>> > and
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for
>>>>>> reform in
>>>>>> > the
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           ICT
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled
>>>>>> growth and
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           development.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of
>>>>>> acceptable
>>>>>> > behaviors
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           online that you follow in real life: respect people's
>>>>>> times and
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           bandwidth,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize,
>>>>>> respect
>>>>>> > privacy,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       do
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >           not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       --
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       Barrack O. Otieno
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       +254721325277 <0721%20325277>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       +254733206359 <0733%20206359>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       Skype: barrack.otieno
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       PGP ID: 0x2611D86A
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       kictanet mailing list
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       mailman/options/kictanet/jkieti%40gmail.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder
>>>>>> > platform
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT
>>>>>> policy and
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform
>>>>>> in the
>>>>>> > ICT
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       development.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable
>>>>>> > behaviors
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       online that you follow in real life: respect people's times
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       bandwidth,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect
>>>>>> privacy,
>>>>>> > do
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     --
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     John Kieti
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     Phone: +254-735-764242 <0735%20764242> // +254-722-764242
>>>>>> <0722%20764242>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     Twitter: @johnKieti // Skype:  jkieti
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     Blog: gmeltdown.com <http://www.gmeltdown.com> // LinkedIn:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     https://ke.linkedin.com/in/*kieti* <
>>>>>> https://ke.linkedin.com/in/kieti>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     The ordinary just won't do
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >   --
>>>>>> >   Barrack O. Otieno
>>>>>> >   +254721325277 <0721%20325277>
>>>>>> >   +254733206359 <0733%20206359>
>>>>>> >   Skype: barrack.otieno
>>>>>> >   PGP ID: 0x2611D86A
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >   _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >   kictanet mailing list
>>>>>> >   kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>>>> >   https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>>>> >   Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>>>>> >   Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >   Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>>>>> > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/info%4
>>>>>> 0campusciti.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >   The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder
>>>>>> platform
>>>>>> > for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> > regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the
>>>>>> ICT
>>>>>> > sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and
>>>>>> > development.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >   KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable
>>>>>> behaviors
>>>>>> > online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and
>>>>>> bandwidth,
>>>>>> > share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect
>>>>>> privacy, do
>>>>>> > not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> --------------------
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > kictanet mailing list
>>>>>> > kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>>>> > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>>>> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>>>>> > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>>>>> > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ldinga
>>>>>> %40managecom.co.ke
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder
>>>>>> platform for
>>>>>> > people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>>>>>> > regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the
>>>>>> ICT
>>>>>> > sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and
>>>>>> > development.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable
>>>>>> behaviors
>>>>>> > online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and
>>>>>> bandwidth,
>>>>>> > share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect
>>>>>> privacy, do
>>>>>> > not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Barrack O. Otieno
>>>>>> +254721325277 <0721%20325277>
>>>>>> +254733206359 <0733%20206359>
>>>>>> Skype: barrack.otieno
>>>>>> PGP ID: 0x2611D86A
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> kictanet mailing list
>>>>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/m
>>>>>> ailman/options/kictanet/murigi.muraya%40gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder
>>>>>> platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy
>>>>>> and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>>>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable
>>>>>> behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and
>>>>>> bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect
>>>>>> privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> SMM
>>>>>
>>>>> *"Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than
>>>>> one who takes a city." Prov 16:32*
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> kictanet mailing list
>>>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>>>
>>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/m
>>>>> ailman/options/kictanet/kaninimutemi%40gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder
>>>>> platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy
>>>>> and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>>>>>
>>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>>>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
>>>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>>>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Mercy Mutemi, Advocate*.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> kictanet mailing list
>>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>>
>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/m
>>>> ailman/options/kictanet/murigi.muraya%40gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
>>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>>>>
>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
>>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> SMM
>>>
>>> *"Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than one
>>> who takes a city." Prov 16:32*
>>>
>> --
>> *Mercy Mutemi, Advocate*.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> SMM
>
> *"Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than one
> who takes a city." Prov 16:32*
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/
> mailman/options/kictanet/otieno.barrack%40gmail.com
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>
>


-- 
Barrack O. Otieno
+254721325277
+254733206359
Skype: barrack.otieno
PGP ID: 0x2611D86A
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20171005/9e9d1efc/attachment.htm>


More information about the KICTANet mailing list